Think of an argument as being a triangle composed of audience, the claim, and the writer. Who is the audience for this argumet? Are they going to like, dislike, or be neutral about the argument? What is the claim? How is it developed? Is the evidence in the right places to be convincing? Is the research limited to sources that support the claim? What is the writer's position and credibility: an authority or a concerned citizen? Remember that feeling strongly about an issue does not automatically enable a writer to argue about the issue effectively. The writer needs to back up the claim clearly and convincingly with current and accurate information.
When you evaluate an argument you need to consider two steps.
Student responses may vary. Acceptable answers include:
In this absence of nine years I find a great improvement in New York. Some say it has improved because I have been away. Others, and I agree with them, say it has improved because I have come back. We must judge of a city by its external appearances and by its inward character. In externals the foreigner coming to these shores is more impressed at first by our skyscrapers. In the daylight they are ugly. They are—well, too chimneyfied and too snaggy—like a mouth that needs attention from a dentist; like a cemetery that is all monuments and no gravestones. But at night, seen from the river where they are columns towering against the sky, all sparkling with light, they are fairylike; they are beauty more satisfactory to the soul and more enchanting than anything that man has dreamed of since the Arabian nights. We can't always have the beautiful aspect of things. Let us make the most of our sights that are beautiful and let the others go. When your foreigner makes disagreeable comments on New York by daylight, float him down the river at night. What has made these skyscrapers possible is the elevator. The cigar-box which the European calls a "lift" needs but to be compared with our elevators to be appreciated. New Yorkers have the cleanest, quickest, and most admirable system of street railways in the world has been forced upon you by the abnormal appreciation. Nobody else would have brought such a system into existence. We ought to build him a monument. We owe him one as much as we owe one to anybody. Nothing permanent, of course; build it of plaster, say. Then gaze at it and realize how grateful we are—for the time being—and then pull it down and throw it on the ash-heap. That's the way to honor your public heroes. As to our streets, I find them cleaner. I miss those dear old landmarks, the symmetrical mountain ranges of dust and dirt that used to be piled up along the streets for the wind and rain to tear down at their pleasure. Compared with the wretched attempts of London to light that city, New York may fairly be said to be a well-lighted city. Why, London's attempt at good lighting is almost as bad as London's attempt at rapid transit. There is just one good system of rapid transit in London—the "Tube," and that, of course, had been put in by Americans. Perhaps, after a while, those Americans will come back and give New York also a good underground system. It is by the laws of the city, it is by the manners of the city, it is by the ideals of the city, it is by the customs of the city and by the municipal government which all these elements correct, support, and foster, by which the foreigner judges the city. It is by these that he realizes that New York may, indeed, hold her head high among the cities of the world. Gentlemen, you have the best municipal government in the world—the purest and the most fragrant. You got it by a noble fidelity to civic duty. You got it by stern and ever-watchful exertion of the great powers with which you are charged by the rights which were handed down to you by your forefathers, by your manly refusal to let base men invade the high places of your government.
This selection is not copyrighted in the U.S.